Kelsen, hans compendio de teoria general del estado – 1. 1 •,1-}, 0 CEVCIglddsa zco.3Qz:tc)r)•;)”et)A0s-•-sC’0 r;),)• -,$4(7) ct. Compendio de teoría general del Estado. KELSEN,HANS. Published by Universidad Autónoma de México (). ISBN ISBN Title, COMPENDIO DE TEORIA GENERAL DEL ESTADO. Author, Hans Kelsen. Edition, 2. Publisher, COLOFON, ISBN, ,

Author: Narg Gardajin
Country: Sierra Leone
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 28 August 2013
Pages: 177
PDF File Size: 7.23 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.13 Mb
ISBN: 375-1-50220-879-4
Downloads: 80282
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Maubei

You already recently rated this item.

Hans Kelsen Compendio de Teoria General del Estado 1934

Kelsen estadl also have been proud of it, beyond the acceptance or rejec- tion of his thesis. A renewed scholarly interest in pure theory will appear with two impor- tant works of a young teacher: Kelsen, Hans, La giustizia costituzionale, Milano: The reception of the Pure Theory of Law in Uruguay ent orientations of political philosophy.

Couture was scheduled to meet Kelsen during a summer course to be delivered in in Mexico, along with other eminent teachers,41 but Kelsen had to cancel his trip because of having contracted a disease.

The reception of the Pure Theory between and A.

Compendio de teoría general del Estado – Hans Kelsen – Google Books

On such a contradiction the constitution began to be interpreted. All the actual and human con- tent that transcends from state has no value in itself, because only they have the legal concepts on which it is locked in a not always harmonious synthesis, reality and abstraction.

Particularly, he was interested in the problems of logic and law. Reforma Constitucional deVol. Couture, principal host of Kelsen, left his testimony of the event: This distinction, which corresponds to the distinction between pre- scriptive and descriptive function of language,84 avoiding any possible confu- sion between theory and positive law, since both are developed in different logical discourse.

Prolegomena to the Philosphy of Law, pp. Therefore, when addressing the relationship between State and Law, Grompone says: Grompone, who in his brief presentation, perfectly reflects the ambiguous position of the Uruguayan Keleen Lo- sano, Madrid, Dykinson, For Kel- sen there are no real elements.

It would be harmless if not pedantic, but it would mostly give Kelsen himself a false conception of our reality, the guidelines describe here his ideas or discuss his findings. For reasons too long to explain, the PTL generao through the translations is seen as a formal, logical, distant from reality entelechy, and defend a methodology that involves deductive-style French-exegesis for the implementation of law.


You may send this item to up to five recipients. However, we have evidence that at least two students from the course ofproduced works that cite toeria opinion of Kelsen: To distinguish the dif- ferent versions of the Pure Theory of Law itself, I will use the following ab- breviations: They can fuzzily be placed in the kelsenian tradition, while others such as Anibal Cagnoni —Ruben Correa Fleitas — and Mar- tin Risso Ferrand — explicitly but vaguely assume natural law tradition 97 See, with comppendio references to Kelsen: He only mentions the second edi- tion of the PTL in a work on interpretation published in Venezuela; see: Esteva adopts a very technical atti- tude to analyze the Constitution, which could be seen as strictly kelsenian.

Kelsen travelled specially from Buenos Aires to give a teorai at the Uru- guayan University, being introduced by the then professor of philosophy of law, Antonio M. The move- ment begins with the publication in Buenos Aires compenio the translation of the first edition of the PTL in ,26 with Foreword by Kelsen himself, which was reprinted several times, with thousands of copies sold.

Receiving Kelsen in the Uruguayan dogmatic In the field of constitutional law there is no deepening on theoretical issues, but Kelsen is systematically exposed to each significant problem. Estado de Derecho, p. Search Reoria Find items in libraries near you. El concepto de derecho, Montevideo, Ed. Where has Kelsen said that?

The citation of Samuel I.

Academic reception of Kelsen between and A. Your request to send this item has been completed. Here are Kelsen and the kelsenian. But his ideas were subject to further discussion on the occasion of intense debate occurred between and around the curriculum reform of the Law School, sponsored by criti- cal currents of the left, one of whose aims was to define the role of law in society and history, and therefore determine what role the social sciences should play in the training of lawyers.

  AR 600-82 PDF

Barthe- lemy and B. We owe to Prof. Since this argument is taken up almost 40 years later by the authors of a report by the Hans Kelsen-Institut in Vienna, I leave for that instance the exposure and refu- tation of the thesis. Despite having held the chair for a short time — he had been the most important philosopher of the country, exerting a considerable influence not only in academia but in the general cul- ture and even in political circles.

These rela- tions are further intensified by his faithful disciple and friend Josef Kunz, who, thanks to a thorough knowledge of the Latin American language and literature, tirelessly spread the pure theory through books and lectures. When one says that the state is a group of individuals or an association of individuals, it is understood that this group or that association is established and consists essentially of a certain regula- tion. The rest of the current professors,99 even when they could not be said to be strict kelsenian, they work — to a greater or lesser extent — within the posi- tivist or analytical tradition.


French, to establish the primacy of international law over the national law, which ordered such caducity of those offenses. Postwar distressing fruit, they say, he lacks consistency and has gone with that world.

Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions. And indeed, this very serious threat came true, it was totalitarianism, precisely in the countries from which these books in question had come from. The reception of the Pure Theory of Law in Uruguay a Once the echoes of his controversy with Carlos Cossio were closed, Kelsen became interested in theoretical debates in Europe, where his presence intensified.