Natalie Angier is an American nonfiction writer and a science journalist for The New York Times Video: Natalie Angier – The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science (May 16, Panel discussion with Neil Turok, Michael D. Griffin, Nadia El-Awady and Stewart Brand, at the Quantum to Cosmos festival. Editorial Reviews. From Publishers Weekly. Science is underappreciated and undervalued in a The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science – Kindle edition by Natalie Angier. Download it once and read it on your Kindle. Natalie Angier, a science writer for the New York Times, has written a wonderful book called The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||9 July 2008|
|PDF File Size:||5.36 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.35 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If the author had pulled out 99 percent of the jokes and puns and filled in that space with genuine prose, rich imagery, and flowery anecdotes, the book would have benefited greatly from it. It’s all very promising, but The Canon is a narrative of promise unfulfilled. Angiee reading this chapter it seemed like a veil lifted from my eyes, and I got excited and yelled, “I get it!
I only wish some of my teachers in high school had been as interesting as Ms. In all, a good way to bring the science fearful into a basic understanding that could be nurtured into interest or even love.
The goal of this book is to recapture science from the nerdy margins of society. Stopping and starting and lurching and joking just distracts the mind from being absorbed in the wonders of the scientific landscape. A column needs to be pithy, attention grabbing, and droll. First, Angier cannot caon more than two paragraphs without throwing in some want-to-be-clever non sequitur.
It was hard to give this two stars. Sometimes her metaphors are strange and obtuse themselves, which can impede understanding, thereby defeating the attempt, but on the whole, most moderately read individuals will find them helpful, and often times humorous.
It’s just that there were two problems really should have been addressed. Jan 19, Kaitlyn Dennis rated it liked it Shelves: Natalis of the latter is a very good way to get across to the lay reader the nuances of a highly technical matter in a way they may more readily comprehend. Seems a shame because now I find that stuff very interesting. Angier is what is known as a popular science writer, as she writes for the layman. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. To ask other readers questions about The Canonplease sign up.
PBS broadcasts of Suze Orman? The result was a bastard child caught somewhere between the two that had an annoying sing-song quality, a Dr. But then, enticing though the premise was, it was flawed.
They’re uncomfortably packed together like the reliably rude commuters crammed onto the N train during my mundane morning migration to work. In a book that is striving to be conversational, she chooses rather obscure and heady words to toss around.
A book needs to carry the attention like a camel on a journey through the desert. Agnier for telling us about the problem. Amazon Music Transmite millones de canciones. Dec 08, Elazar rated it did not like it.
Lab fab guide to life
Once again, I would like to take my fellow Christians aside and explain to them that all fields of science even those that didn’t yet exist in Darwin’s day, such as genetics and mol. The biggest reason for this seemed to be to avoid scaring any unwary readers with “math” or “hard” science. She gives the impression, through her word choices, that she isn’t trying to have a conversation with the reader, so much as impress them with all the SAT words she knows.
The result was a bastard child caught somewhere between the two that had an annoying sing-song quali I gave up on this one after about pages. It’s a logical sequence and a narrative the lay reader can easily follow. Prime Now Entrega en 1 hora En miles de productos. The Bitch in the Nztalie Sciences are ‘hard the way diamonds and rubies are hard,’ Angier tells us. Image courtesy of Natalie Angier. In particular, my physics teacher in high school was a waste of meat.
Book Review: The Canon by Natalie Angier | SPANISH INQUISITOR
The problem ccanon, there’s a difference between writing a column and writing a book. Excellent book for anyone who was interested in science as a child and had it slowly leached out of them by the public school system.
Her writing is a bit facile, but it’s still a great read.
But when the frequency of jokes is one per line, rather than, say, one per paragraph or one per half-page, one does get a little weary of them.
Overall, I can’ I liked this more than I thought I might, given the reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. The process of acquiring beliefs is a dangerous one, since it is inherent in human nature that once we have convinced ourselves of the truth or falsity of any matter, it is well nigh impossible anyier shake that belief, even when confronted with almost irrefutable evidence.
Second, as made clear in the first two chapters, Angier’s aim is to introduce scientific topics to a broad and perhaps unwilling audience.
Overall, a lackluster book that did not meet its own expectations.
The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science
I didn’t think so back in high school but I like to think I’ve matured since then. The layman wants batalie demonstration. Her job, the one she strives to attain perfection in, is to translate, in a sense, the arcane and nztalie language of science, as written by actual scientists, into the language of the common man.
Natalie Angier writes wonderful columns which frequently appear in the New York Times. I found that the less I knew about a subject the more I enjoyed the material. To be fair, she did present the material in a linear order that made it relatively easy for me to see how one freestanding fact might follow naturally from the one s preceding it.
This book sets out an alternative pantheon. Let’s see what’s there Her writing style is very light, loaded with enthusiasm, and a bit chatty at nattalie. I’m just glad I already love science, or I’d never want anything to do with it again.